The minister contended that initial American objectives centered on a demand for unconditional capitulation. According to his account, Tehran’s refusal to yield forced a shift in the negotiating dynamic, resulting in a draft agreement that he claims tilts in Iran's favor. Araghchi suggested that while the administration originally pursued a policy of regime change, the persistence of his government ultimately compelled a shift toward a negotiated settlement.
Washington continues to prioritize the neutralization of Iran’s nuclear program, a stance reinforced by the Trump administration. Envoy Jared Kushner has maintained that any viable deal must strictly curb nuclear development and dismantle Iranian support for regional proxies. Despite the optimistic rhetoric from Tehran, the White House insists that its stringent conditions remain the baseline for any future progress in the talks.





Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!