PP Chaudhary Defends One Nation, One Election Against Federalism Concerns

Chaudhary noted that the committee has completed over 20 meetings, consulting a broad range of experts, including six former Chief Justices of India. Of the 12 prominent legal figures engaged, only one expressed dissent regarding the plan. The committee’s outreach included discussions with former Supreme Court judges and the Law Commission chairman to ensure the proposal maintains constitutional integrity.

The push for simultaneous polls stems from a vision to streamline governance, focusing on infrastructure and education. Chaudhary emphasized that state-specific lists remain untouched, as the initiative aims solely to align dates rather than alter jurisdictional boundaries. He pointed to historical precedent, noting that India held simultaneous elections for the first two decades post-independence before the cycle fragmented due to frequent state assembly dissolutions.

Beyond administrative savings, the committee highlighted the impact on the education sector. Teachers and school facilities are often diverted for election duties, leading to significant classroom closures. According to the committee, the economic burden of holding separate elections could reach Rs 7 lakh crore. Chaudhary argued that these funds, if redirected toward human development and social justice schemes, would provide a substantial boost to the country's youth. Regarding logistical concerns, he confirmed that the Election Commission is prepared to handle the demand for additional electronic voting machines provided they receive six months of lead time.