Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, appearing for Chadha, contends that the digital content in question goes beyond satire. He argues that material depicting the politician switching loyalties for financial gain inflicts concrete reputational damage. The legal team seeks interim relief, asserting that unauthorized AI manipulation of a public figure’s likeness demands judicial intervention to prevent further harm.
During recent proceedings, the court highlighted the tension between safeguarding individual dignity and preserving the right to free speech. Justice Prasad noted that political discourse often involves harsh criticism, making the distinction between defamation and expression a central challenge. To navigate these complexities, the court is considering the appointment of an amicus curiae to examine how evolving AI technology intersects with existing personality rights.

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!