“The reason we lost is the war,” Vance wrote, adding that Trump had said so the previous night. He also challenged supporters of the conflict to argue that losing the Senate for the next six years was a worthwhile price. A source familiar with Vance’s thinking told The Telegraph that the vice-president wanted to make clear he had opposed the war from the start.
The comments have also been interpreted as an effort to establish Vance as a leading voice in the Republican Party, particularly among MAGA supporters, the report said. Vance had privately opposed Trump’s decision to enter another foreign conflict since the United States launched its war against Iran on February 28. He has long been associated with the America First approach, which emphasizes domestic interests over overseas wars. “This was JD going out on his own, saying this was my case and I was right,” a source told the newspaper. Another source said Vance had “come out on top” and was now “the leader of the American Right.”
The election result has also heightened concerns about Trump’s position during the remaining two years of his term. Sources close to the president told The Telegraph he was unhappy with the outcome, while advisers were considering how to protect his standing as Democrats gain greater control in Congress. The report said the White House could face greater isolation as Democrats advance legislation Trump may have to approve or veto.
A possible Cabinet reshuffle is under discussion, with officials whose loyalty may be in question potentially facing scrutiny. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who played a key role in the Iran war, is reportedly among those whose position is uncertain. Sergio Gor, the US ambassador to India, is also being considered for a senior administration role, possibly White House chief of staff.
Vance’s public criticism has added to the uncertainty. One source questioned why he had not discussed the remarks with Trump first. “He didn’t run the tweet past the president,” the source said. Another accused Vance and his team of panicking. The report suggested that speaking out after the defeat could help Vance distinguish his political identity from Trump’s as debate over the party’s future begins.





Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!