The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined that a district judge erred by relying solely on an unclassified record when upholding the company’s placement on the blacklist. While the appellate court dismissed DJI’s broader claims regarding due process and inconsistent treatment, it found merit in the argument that the government failed to justify why the firm is considered a contributor to China’s defense industrial base.
Placement on the list prohibits the Defense Department from contracting with the company, with a wider ban on third-party product purchases scheduled for 2027. DJI maintains it is neither owned nor controlled by the Chinese military, asserting that the designation has caused significant financial harm and unfairly stigmatized the brand. The district court is now instructed to review classified materials to determine if the Secretary of Defense’s original decision holds water under deeper scrutiny. This legal pushback arrives as the Pentagon continues to aggressively expand its list, which now encompasses 188 Chinese firms, including Alibaba and WuXi AppTec.





Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!