The current tension between Ankara and Jerusalem is defined by a paradox: they are regional rivals with conflicting goals in a post-Assad Syria, yet they remain tethered by a technical deconfliction channel mediated through Baku. While Israel seeks a fragmented, weak Syria to prevent hostile encroachment, Turkey is betting on a centralized Damascus under Ahmed al-Sharaa to finally neutralize its long-standing Kurdish insurgency. This collision of interests has already forced Israel to increase its strike frequency in Syrian territory threefold since late 2024.
Despite the friction, Turkey’s military reality dictates caution. With the 'Steel Dome' air-defense system years from completion and its F-16 fleet awaiting American upgrades, the Turkish general staff is acutely aware of its limitations. Erdoğan’s anti-Israel posturing serves domestic electoral needs, but his administration has avoided any direct troop movements that would trigger an open conflict. The risk lies not in a deliberate declaration of war, but in the volatile Syrian interior. If the integration of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces into the national army fails, and Turkish forces move into areas where Israel has been quietly arming local militias, the two militaries may find themselves in a direct, accidental collision. For now, the deconfliction line remains the only barrier preventing their shadow rivalry from turning into a full-scale regional crisis.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!