The Chief Minister, who describes himself as an enthusiast of the art form, argued that creative liberty cannot serve as a blanket justification for obscenity. He emphasized that while the Indian Constitution protects expressive rights, those rights remain tethered to the dignity of others. In his view, humor loses its legitimacy when it crosses into territory that infringes upon the rights of private citizens.
This intervention comes as state authorities finalize a First Information Report targeting More and several associates for the digital distribution of material deemed obscene. Fadnavis maintained that the state is not seeking to stifle creativity but rather to enforce boundaries that prevent comedy from becoming a vehicle for public offense. For the administration, the current legal friction serves as a reminder that artistic expression carries an inherent duty to respect established societal norms.





Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!