The controversy began when Gandhi and Kharge requested an audience with the CJI to submit a memorandum covering topics ranging from the Election Commission’s conduct to the detention of students and transit disruptions. On October 11, the Chief Justice declined the request, noting that these matters are already subject to ongoing litigation. He emphasized that discussing pending cases outside the courtroom would violate judicial propriety and the fundamental principle of separation of powers.
In a formal resolution dated October 12, SCAORA underscored that the judiciary must remain insulated from political pressure. The association stated that any attempt to bypass established legal procedures threatens the fair administration of justice. The CJI had previously advised the opposition leaders to utilize Article 32 or the court's e-filing system to bring their concerns before the bench, promising an expedited hearing for such petitions. By backing this stance, SCAORA signaled a firm commitment to maintaining the court’s role as an adjudicator of law rather than an administrative body for political grievances.
/filters:format(webp)/asomiyapratidin/media/media_files/2026/05/11/157f5cd9-392c-4b91-9619-0dbfae8c3804-2026-05-11-21-56-33.jpg)



Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!