The court’s decision relied heavily on testimonies from two wrestlers, yet the final ruling highlighted significant procedural red flags. Judge’s observations pointed toward inconsistencies in the complainants’ records, specifically noting that multiple individuals used identical addresses across different districts. These discrepancies suggested to the court that external political influence played a role in shaping the narrative.
Singh maintains that the entire legal ordeal was a targeted campaign designed to undermine his leadership. By naming the Hooda family as the primary architects of the intervention, he is shifting the focus from the initial claims of misconduct to a broader debate over factional power struggles within the Indian wrestling circuit.





Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!