Ain Bahadur Mahar, Chief Whip of the CPN-UML, condemned the entrance as a violation of established legislative protocol, which strictly bars such disruptions during floor debates. The brief nature of the visit, occurring during a critical address, left opposition members questioning the executive’s commitment to parliamentary decorum and democratic accountability.
Beyond the procedural friction, lawmakers are demanding clarity regarding the Prime Minister’s recent remarks on the border with India. Critics argue that Shah’s prolonged absence and subsequent refusal to engage in substantive debate signal a broader pattern of executive avoidance. As pressure mounts, the administration faces growing scrutiny over its reluctance to address these urgent national concerns on the record.




Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first!